Few years back officers of income tax department were conducting raid and searching for the address of a person who is Director of many companies. After long hours of search they reached in a slum and located the house. Within few minutes, the director reached in his house by hearing the news. He came on his bicycle and surprised to see senior officers in his house. More surprise was to the Income tax officers, they could never imagine such a person who is director of many multi Crore companies living in a slum and traveling on bicycle. They did not get anything for raid and the director did not know spelling of the word "Director".
This is the story of a multi Crore company where peon, sweepers,
clerks, officers etc were compelled to become director of the
companies, and they obeyed either to save their job or for
honour. The common practice was to compel the employees to
become Directors, Authorised signatories etc and those who do
not agree for that was treated as coward and sacked from the
organization.
After the raid many employees become victims and they faced
harassment from Income Tax Department, Sales Tax Department,
ROC, Electricity Department and many statutory authorities. Some
of them received demand notice for Crores of rupees which they
cannot pay within their life period. Many employees run away
from the town, which caused spoiling their family life,
professional life and even their children's education. Even now
many employees are fighting cases in different departments and
court.
What the employer did?
After the raid, the employer just disowned the
employees/companies and send declarations to different
departments that the share holders and directors of the
companies are responsible for the liability of the company and
the employers are not directors or shareholders of the company.
These employers should definitely be treated as criminals who
have ultimate cruelty and selfish attitude. Many employees of
this organisaton sacrificed their life just for some increment
or designation. But some employees who don't know to write a
sentence in English are getting lacs of Rupees salary just
because they are fit to act as director and they are still
continuing with the same employer.
We call them "Director Directed by others" and they accept it
with a smile.
Employees of these companies always believed that the employer
will be with them for anything and everything. But they did not
apply their common sense. Those who want to do genuine business
with ethics will never appoint their peon as director of their
company. They themselves will take responsibility for that. The
employers who want to do un ethical business and cheat the
government and other departments are following this method.
What is the status of such Directors before Law ROC, Income Tax
Department, Sales Tax Department and other Government
Departments?
In simple words the directors and shareholders are responsible
for the liabilities of the company. Due to this, poor employees
who act as director are facing harassment from different
departments and compelled to fight the case by spending money
from their pocket. There are few provisions in the law where the
court can lift or pierce corporate veil to identify the real
persons who are behind the company.
Lifting or Piercing corporate veil - Indian Companies Act 1956 -
Relevant Sections 45, 147, 212 and 542
An incorporated company is clothed with a distinct personality
by fiction of law. But a Company is an artificial person and it
cannot act its own, it can only act through natural persons. But
where the legal entity of a corporate body is misused for
fraudulent or dishonest purposes the individuals concerned will
not be allowed to take shelter behind the corporate personality.
The principle of "lifting the corporate veil" has found statutory recognition in certain provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 such as Sections 45, 147, 212, 247 and 542 of the Act.
Determination of Real Character of Company
In times of war, it may become necessary to lift the Corporate
Veil of the Company to determine whether the company has an
enemy character. In such a case the courts may in their
discretion examine the character of persons who are in real
control of the corporate affairs of the company.
To Prevent Evasion of Taxation
The principle of separate legal personality is being used to
evade tax in many cases. In such situation the court can take
necessary steps to identify the real persons who are operating
behind corporate personality. This provision is helpful for the
victims who are compelled to act as directors.
Avoidance of Welfare Legislation
If it found that the sole purpose of the formation of new
company was to use it as a device to avoid liability under any
welfare legislation, the court may lift the corporate veil to
look at the real transaction and purpose behind it.
Prevention of Fraud or Improper Conduct
Where the corporate entity has been used for fraud or improper
conduct or to defect or circumvent the law, the courts may
pierce the corporate veil to look into the realities of the
situation. This provision is helpful for the victims who are
compelled to act as directors.
Where a corporate façade is really an agency or trust
Sometimes a company may be deemed to have lost it individuality
in favour of its principle and treated merely as an agent or
trustee. This may be by creating holding and subsidiary company.
In some circumstances the court may treat holding company and
its subsidiary as single entity. But there must be evidence that
the business of two is combined.
The court have sometimes applied the doctrine of lifting the
corporate veil in quasi-criminal cases relating to companies in
order to look behind the legal person and punish the real person
who have violated the law.
These provisions may give some relief to the employees who are
compelled to act as directors just to save their job. But they
cannot escape from harassment.
So, before becoming director of a company think twice. You may
get another job but you won't get another life.
Dishonour of Cheque - Offences by Companies - Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881
Issue of Sweat Equity Shares - Section 79-A of Indian Companies Act, 1956
Software Piracy and Law regarding software piracy - The Copyright Act 1957
Filing of Annual Returns with Registrar of Companies - Indian Companies Act, 1956
Section 498A of Indian Penal Code - use and mis use by women and relatives
Banking Regulation Act - Applicability to certain co-operative Banks
Cheque Returned without payment?, Cases in which banker is Justified in Refusing Payment
Stop payment of Cheque by drawer and applicability of Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881