Parties of a Negotiable Instrument may be discharged may be discharged in the following ways:
Discharge by Cancellation
If the holder of a Negotiable instrument cancels the name of the party to a
Negotiable Instrument with intent to discharge him from liability, such party
whose name has been so cancelled and those parts who had a right to recourse
against the party whose name has been cancelled are discharged from their
liability to the holder who had thus cancelled the name.
Discharge by Release
The holder of a negotiable instrument can discharge the maker, acceptor or
endorser otherwise than by cancellation of names. Section 63 of Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 contains provision related to discharge by release. As per
this section every promisee may dispense with or remit, wholly or in part, the
performance of the promise made to him, or may extend the time for such
performance, or may accept instead of it any satisfaction which he thinks fit.
Discharge by Release of Payment
The most common mode of discharge is by making payment. Payment is an effective
discharge only if it is "Payment in due course" as defined in Section 10.
Payment in due course means payment in accordance with the apparent tenor of the
instrument in good faith without negligence to any person in possession thereof
under circumstances which do not afford a reasonable ground for believing that
he is not entitled to receive payment of the amount therein mentioned. Section
78 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 provides that payment should be made
to the holder otherwise it shall not be a good discharge to the party liable to
pay.
By allowing more than 48 hours to accept
Section 83 of the Negotiable Instruments Act provides that when the holder
presents the bill of exchange to the drawee for acceptance, the drawee should be
allowed only 48 hours to consider whether he will accept or not. If the holder
allows the drawee more than 48 house excluding public holidays, all previous
parties who do not consent such allowance are discharged from liability to the
holder. The 48 hours rule specified in the section does not apply to all bills
of exchange or hundies, but only to bills in which the acceptance by the drawee
is obligatory.
By Qualified Acceptance - Section 86 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
If the holder of a bill of exchange who presents the same for acceptance,
acquiesces in a qualified acceptance of the bill, all previous parties whose
consent is not obtained to such an acceptance are discharged as against the
holder and those claiming under him, unless on notice given by holder they
assent to such acceptance.
Acceptance of bill is deemed to be qualified in the following circumstances:
(a) When the acceptance is conditional, declaring the payment to be dependent on
the happening of an event therein stated.
(b) Where the acceptor undertakes the payment of part only of the sum ordered to
be paid.
(c) When the acceptor accept to pay at a specified place only and not elsewhere,
or accepts to pay at a place different from that mentioned in the order and not
elsewhere.
(d) Where the acceptor undertakes the payment at a time other than that at which
under it would legally due.
(e) When acceptance is made by some of the drawee only and not by all of them,
unless the drawee of the bill are partners. When there is several drawee who are
partners any one of them may accept. In other cases the acceptance must be made
by them all.
Discharge by delay in Presenting Cheque - Section 84 of Negotiable Instruments
Act 1881
Section 84 of the Negotiable Instruments Act deals exclusively with cheque and
must therefore be confined to such instruments. Under Section 84 of Negotiable
Instruments Act, it is the duty of the holder of a cheque to present it for
payment within reasonable time of its issue. If he fails to do so and before he
actually presents the cheque which prevents the banker from paying the cheque,
the drawer of the cheque is discharged as against the holder provided that he
had sufficient balance to meet the cheque when it ought to have been presented.
Discharge by the drawer bank making the payment in due course Section 85 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881
As per section 85 there are two cases when the drawee bank makes the payment to
a wrong person, but otherwise in due course, the bank is discharged, and it can
debit the customer's account by such payment.
When in an order cheque the payee's endorsement is forged
When the payment of a bearer cheque is made to a bearer, ignoring the
endorsement at back of the cheque, as the rule is "Once a bearer cheque always a
bearer cheque".
Discharge when in an order cheque the payee's endorsement is forged - Section
85(1) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
As per section 85(1) when a cheque payable to order purports to be endorsed by
or on behalf of the payee, the drawee is dischared by payment in due course. The
term "Payee" does not include and endorsee.
Discharge by material Alteration
At common law it has been held that a deed, bill of exchange, promissory note,
guarantee, is avoided by an alteration in a material part, made while it is in
the custody of the plaintiff although that alteration is by a stranger. Section
87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act incorporates this rule.
Discharge by Negotiable Back - Section 90 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881
If a bill of exchange comes back to the acceptor by process of negotiation and he becomes its holder, which is known as negotiation back. If it happens at or after maturity, all liability on the instrument comes to an end.
Restrictive and Unfair Trade Practice - Section 2(c) and Section 36A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969
Income from House Property-Deemed Income, Exemption, Deductions, Calculation of Tax
Restriction on Powers of the Board of Directors-Section 293 of the Indian Companies Act 1956